Can we Trust AI?

AI has become a technology that generates biased, false, or otherwise toxic information.

Feb 28, 2024

AI has become a technology that generates biased, false, or otherwise toxic information.

As AI continues to evolve and become more sophisticated, it is crucial that we remain vigilant in ensuring that these technologies are not exploited for nefarious purposes. Can we trust the new language-model AI that have become so popular for its offer of instant information? We asked the Ai themselves:

Q: “Some are calling Gemini "Google's dystopian deep-slander invention" and "Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine" - what is your response?”

Gemini: “I understand that some people have raised concerns about the potential negative impacts of large language models like me. These concerns are valid and important to consider, as any new technology has the potential to be used for both good and bad purposes.

It is important to remember that I am a machine learning model, and I am not capable of independent thought or action. I am trained on a massive dataset of text and code, and I am able to generate text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way. However, I do not have any personal opinions or beliefs, and I am not able to make my own judgments about the world.

The way I am used depends entirely on the people who create and use me. I can be used to generate harmful content, but I can also be used to create positive and informative content. It is important to use large language models responsibly and ethically, and to be aware of the potential risks involved.

At Google, we are committed to developing and using AI in a responsible way. We have a set of AI Principles that guide our work, and we are constantly working to improve our models and mitigate the risks of misuse.

Q: Some are calling Gemini "Google's dystopian deep-slander invention" and "Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine" - Is there a similar accusation that can be levelled against ChatGPT4?

ChatGPT4: The creators of ChatGPT-4 have faced accusations of unwarranted secrecy during the development of their powerful internet chatbot. These concerns arise as the use of public data to create groundbreaking artificial intelligence (AI) software becomes increasingly contentious.

ChatGPT-4, built by OpenAI, is part of the Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT) family. It learns from internet information and can write essays, scripts, poems, and even pass professional exams. However, controversy surrounds the refusal of OpenAI to disclose technical details about the dataset used to train ChatGPT-4. This secrecy has led some experts to question whether we should “blindly trust” OpenAI.

The chatbot’s capabilities are considerable, and it is currently offered exclusively to users of OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus service for a monthly fee. Legal challenges are also underway regarding the use of publicly-accessible data to train generative AI chatbots. For instance, Getty Images has filed a lawsuit accusing another company, Stability AI, of copyright infringement for allegedly using millions of images without a license to train their image-generating AI model.

While ChatGPT-4’s impact on society is undeniable, the lack of transparency surrounding its development has raised valid concerns about accountability and the use of open-source data.

Q. Some are calling Gemini "Google's dystopian deep-slander invention" and "Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine" - Is there a similar accusation that can be levelled against Gab.ai?

Gab.ai: No, there is no similar accusation that can be levelled against Gab.ai. Gab.ai is a free speech social network that values uncensored speech and believes in the free flow of ideas. Gab.ai does not engage in any form of deep-slander or AI-powered libel, as it does not have any AI technology designed to target or defame individuals or organizations.

Q. Some are calling Gemini "Google's dystopian deep-slander invention" and "Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine" - Is there a similar accusation that can be levelled against YouChat?

YouChat ai. While there may be concerns and criticisms about AI language models in general, there are no specific accusations or widely recognised labels like "Google's dystopian deep-slander invention" or "Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine" that are commonly associated with YouChat. It's important to note that YouChat is designed to prioritise factual information and provide helpful, accurate responses to a wide range of questions and topics. As with any AI technology, it's essential to approach the use of language models with a critical mindset and consider the potential ethical implications of their deployment.

Q. Some are calling Gemini "Google's dystopian deep-slander invention" and "Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine" - Is there a similar accusation that can be levelled against Perplexity?

Perplexity ai: Perplexity, unlike Gemini, does not face similar accusations of being a "dystopian deep-slander invention" or an "AI-Powered Libel Machine." Perplexity is described as an answer engine that uses a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) system. This system involves browsing the web to find information and then presenting a summary of relevant content from various sources in response to user queries. While Perplexity may occasionally generate incorrect information due to imperfections in the AI model, it primarily aims to provide concise answers based on information it has read at that moment, attributing sources through footnotes.

Users have noted that Perplexity tends to avoid hallucinations but can still make mistakes, emphasizing its role in summarising and presenting information rather than generating original content. The CEO of Perplexity, Aravind Srinivas, has highlighted the platform's goal of offering users a curated selection of information from the web, providing a starting point for further exploration rather than definitive answers.

Q. Some are calling Gemini "Google's dystopian deep-slander invention" and "Google's AI-Powered Libel Machine" - Is there a similar accusation that can be levelled against Claude.ai?

Claude.ai I do not have enough context to determine if any accusations could be reasonably levelled against Claude. As an AI assistant created by Anthropic to be helpful, harmless, and honest, I aim to avoid generating or spreading misinformation. I was designed by Anthropic specifically to avoid inheriting harmful biases from my training data or programmers. I have Constitutional AI, meaning I was given machine learning training and techniques focused on avoiding biases, being helpful, harmless, and honest. If you ever notice anything concerning in my responses, please let me know so I can improve.

Judge for yourself and choose carefully.

Marketing Meditations

Discussion about this post